From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFC: clear quit_flag in quit, not throw_exception
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 17:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <501AB42C.4000701@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mx2dqnk8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
On 08/02/2012 05:13 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I noticed that throw_exception clears quit_flag and immediate_quit.
>
> This seems like it could cause gdb to miss C-c sometimes.
> In particular, if a SIGINT arrives and then, before QUIT is called, some
> code in gdb throws an unrelated exception, then the SIGINT will
> effectively be ignored.
>
> It seems to me that it is just as safe, and more correct, to clear these
> flags in the quit function.
If the unrelated exception/error unwinds things all the way up to the
top prompt, managing to bypass all QUIT calls, then we'll end up with
a dangling quit until the next command it entered (resulting in a spurious,
delayed "Quit"), it seems to me. If that analysis is correct, maybe we should
also clear or handle these somehow somewhere near the top loop?
>
> Tom
>
> * exceptions.c (throw_exception): Don't clear quit_flag or
> immediate_quit.
> * utils.c (quit): Clear quit_flag and immediate_quit.
> ---
> gdb/exceptions.c | 3 ---
> gdb/utils.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/exceptions.c b/gdb/exceptions.c
> index 7db9df9..84c21a2 100644
> --- a/gdb/exceptions.c
> +++ b/gdb/exceptions.c
> @@ -221,9 +221,6 @@ exceptions_state_mc_action_iter_1 (void)
> void
> throw_exception (struct gdb_exception exception)
> {
> - quit_flag = 0;
> - immediate_quit = 0;
> -
> do_cleanups (all_cleanups ());
>
> /* Jump to the containing catch_errors() call, communicating REASON
> diff --git a/gdb/utils.c b/gdb/utils.c
> index c69c3e0..6ba8c62 100644
> --- a/gdb/utils.c
> +++ b/gdb/utils.c
> @@ -1055,6 +1055,9 @@ print_sys_errmsg (const char *string, int errcode)
> void
> quit (void)
> {
> + quit_flag = 0;
> + immediate_quit = 0;
> +
> #ifdef __MSDOS__
> /* No steenking SIGINT will ever be coming our way when the
> program is resumed. Don't lie. */
>
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-02 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-02 16:13 Tom Tromey
2012-08-02 17:09 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2012-08-09 20:20 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=501AB42C.4000701@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox