From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1511 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2012 13:51:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 1500 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jul 2012 13:51:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:51:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6PDpjIa014979 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 09:51:45 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6PDph6h008222; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 09:51:44 -0400 Message-ID: <500FF9EF.7040208@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:51:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kratochvil CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] testsuite: Fix Tcl < 7.5 regression [Re: [PATCH] sigall.exp and friends: centralize signals list.] References: <20120719143526.8328.28449.stgit@brno.lan> <20120725134740.GA6900@host2.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20120725134740.GA6900@host2.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00523.txt.bz2 On 07/25/2012 02:47 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > That 'info procs' is in fact not needed, 'proc lreverse' definition is a nop > with new Tcl (=it does not replace the built-in proc of the same name). > But I have rather put the conditional there. I agree; it's more self descriptive that way. I would never imagine lreverse would be so "recent". Thanks. -- Pedro Alves