From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25875 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2012 20:40:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 25865 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jul 2012 20:40:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 20:39:57 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6IKdujV023532 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:39:56 -0400 Received: from valrhona.uglyboxes.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6IKdstG005961 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:39:56 -0400 Message-ID: <50071F1A.5020900@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 20:40:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120605 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "gp >> \"gdb-patches@sourceware.org ml\"" Subject: Re: [RFA] Cleanup: Use add_sal_to_sals for expressions References: <5005D93D.7020808@redhat.com> <878veh3u4z.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <50070B0D.2050002@redhat.com> <87obnc25jq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87obnc25jq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00305.txt.bz2 On 07/18/2012 01:11 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Keith" == Keith Seitz writes: > Keith> So, what do you think of this revised patch? [No regressions on x86-64 > Keith> linux.] > > Ok. Again, thank you, Tom, for taking a look. This has been committed. Keith