From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-20569-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 7460 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2002 08:31:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 7447 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2002 08:31:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cerbere.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.112.250)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Dec 2002 08:31:11 -0000
Received: from laocoon.ics.u-strasbg.fr (laocoon.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.112.72])
	by cerbere.u-strasbg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DBDE02C26B2; Tue,  3 Dec 2002 09:34:38 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20021203092802.034b2c20@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
X-Sender: muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 00:31:00 -0000
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>,
	Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
From: Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Correct gdbserver register packets
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <20021203052113.GA22563@nevyn.them.org>
References: <jevg2cg0og.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
 <5.0.2.1.2.20021126162728.02a31e50@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
 <20021202011500.GA19215@nevyn.them.org>
 <jevg2cg0og.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg00057.txt.bz2

At 06:21 03/12/2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:44:31AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
>> 
>> |> Or else Andreas's patch to decrease the number of registers.  Hmm,
>> |> probably doing it Andreas's way is better.  I'll take care of this in
>> |> the morning.
>> 
>> My way of fixing it is not complete, I get "Wrong sized register packet"
>> messages from gdbserver.
>
>There's a much easier solution: change the 31 to 29, and remove the
>extra two registers from regformats/.  I'm not familiar with any m68k
>stubs; do you know of any others that do or do not include the extra
>two registers, which GDB no longer seems to know anything about?  Or
>are they just bogus?


config/m68k/tm-sun3.h 
seems to use 31 registers including the two not known by
other m68k targets...
But I don't known the state of that target...