From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-19253-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 28518 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2002 15:00:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 28505 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2002 15:00:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cerbere.u-strasbg.fr) (130.79.112.250)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Oct 2002 15:00:14 -0000
Received: from laocoon.ics.u-strasbg.fr (laocoon.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.112.72])
	by cerbere.u-strasbg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 07D1060A; Fri,  4 Oct 2002 17:01:55 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20021004165000.0255b6e0@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
X-Sender: muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 08:00:00 -0000
To: Jason R Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
From: Pierre Muller <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA]Fix cross build of m68k netbsd target
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <20021003080937.O3343@dr-evil.shagadelic.org>
References: <4.2.0.58.20021003085755.00a4dfd0@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
 <4.2.0.58.20021002152937.01418ad0@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
 <4.2.0.58.20021002152937.01418ad0@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
 <20021002091235.L11524@dr-evil.shagadelic.org>
 <4.2.0.58.20021003085755.00a4dfd0@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-10/txt/msg00125.txt.bz2

A 17:09 03/10/2002, vous avez écrit :
>On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 09:16:50AM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote:
>
> > I found these values on a 1.6 m68k netbsd version.
> > Did these value change in version history?
>
>Actually, the real problem is that those values are not the same on
>different m68k platforms.  For example, the amiga uses a different
>value than hp300, which is different again from sun3.  These have to
>do with various machine-dependencies in the kernel VM layout.

Humm, does this simply mean that these value ought 
to be in the native files and that the
code should be modified so that 
if you cross-targeted to m68k netbsd
and use gdbserver, that the
server side gives the correct value back to the 
cross-targeted GDB executable?