From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31401 invoked by alias); 27 May 2019 18:03:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31389 invoked by uid 89); 27 May 2019 18:03:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:461, delay X-HELO: mail-wr1-f50.google.com Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com (HELO mail-wr1-f50.google.com) (209.85.221.50) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 May 2019 18:03:35 +0000 Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id e2so8833491wrv.6 for ; Mon, 27 May 2019 11:03:35 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2001:8a0:f913:f700:4eeb:42ff:feef:f164? ([2001:8a0:f913:f700:4eeb:42ff:feef:f164]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j123sm143919wmb.32.2019.05.27.11.03.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 27 May 2019 11:03:32 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Supress SIGTTOU when handling errors To: Andrew Burgess , Alan Hayward References: <20190516155150.71826-1-alan.hayward@arm.com> <20190516180640.GS2568@embecosm.com> <3935437B-CD4F-4474-B84A-05859CE822DF@arm.com> <7483f478-44d2-b2ce-b0cb-3e984054305a@redhat.com> <20190526224253.GA5667@embecosm.com> Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , nd From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <4e3c7da9-ac41-f3d5-edb6-3dbb2f4e1f3e@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 18:03:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190526224253.GA5667@embecosm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2019-05/txt/msg00595.txt.bz2 On 5/26/19 11:42 PM, Andrew Burgess wrote: > * Alan Hayward [2019-05-24 12:36:43 +0000]: > >> Ok, agreed. >> >> Any objections to me pushing the original patch then? > > Not from me. > > Sorry for any delay I caused in getting the patch merged. Not at all. It was an interesting discussion and revealed that we need to clean up and clarify some comments at least. Thanks, Pedro Alves