From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id my0EFBlC3Wg6SxsAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 01 Oct 2025 11:00:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1759330841; bh=wgoNZQwfQuip5nIYRiDRiwlzrz4LFNcYq1JCdTlBKRg=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=kWmC6C68da8hc/eiTtEMAGKdVe9Kj6zJEpOtlSJe6/6z3JkhJy3PvPlEGEA5lWZhL sAF1I+PxEWjfE9G7ekdSq8B/+vNotzXMpngRkVuIfGKOSemXPX3F8RAn/hVi2q+5L0 2NhSFPOWGH2D7GFa96P8GMZ6huZMHN0IX/213YK8= Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 431321E047; Wed, 01 Oct 2025 11:00:41 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=Ke1Ix/GS; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AA861E047 for ; Wed, 01 Oct 2025 11:00:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACEA3858427 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 15:00:39 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BACEA3858427 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=simark.ca header.i=@simark.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=Ke1Ix/GS Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18ACB3858409; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 14:58:51 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 18ACB3858409 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark.ca ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 18ACB3858409 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=158.69.221.121 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1759330731; cv=none; b=b/szORqeSbYacvvPeIJ+2ahz+09inOlsTX0H0aoUsCir4t9T7rnRsBqnMCWbJkKYMlnxHpeGb2c3xRQqfzSbfi7tx8xowH76Q3gMbfyYbRekOgBISLuVaTjVreHQs977HxnFrBvv5z7oLwxFzeuP7qRJOaX7lSLPgAtLA5pRoIs= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1759330731; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wgoNZQwfQuip5nIYRiDRiwlzrz4LFNcYq1JCdTlBKRg=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=oI+CzJoW30RiWcV/Il028qTl7w5ok+4qJcbIRhEF+Yekq6lS6mKbdWYArF7zuyPgNNnGWBtgCbYgxrwOQBk/i1H1N1XbB/182izgREO8x4cXsKXe0+xCdx0LDJBtskUARB8sEHw7EUE4JoFOrqtl4SFOzfmCvImZL75GMGi4iMc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 18ACB3858409 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=simark.ca; s=mail; t=1759330730; bh=wgoNZQwfQuip5nIYRiDRiwlzrz4LFNcYq1JCdTlBKRg=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=Ke1Ix/GSJhsk+II+dG6tci3bYLm8jIA+JvmlTVDe/WfQ/I9/bzgvNnuqZYo8EOn73 +i7QzwqctbTwQxgM9XXyfARWtW7rWfrKS7eaT4Z8nGGMupb9VZ1kw0As8xbgvqlthN PvToeawjK/O6uy8pzbHw8l1AUzqzDN1LBAkyg7NY= Received: by simark.ca (Postfix) id 1ECD51E047; Wed, 01 Oct 2025 10:58:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4dd1e712-38a2-49f4-ac5a-77ed54b58aa0@simark.ca> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 10:58:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] toplevel: unify the GCC and GDB/binutils .editorconfig files To: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" , Jonathan Wakely Cc: Richard Earnshaw , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20250923164959.565000-1-rearnsha@arm.com> <20250923164959.565000-2-rearnsha@arm.com> <38fb35da-a80d-467c-a8ec-15a398661890@simark.ca> Content-Language: fr From: Simon Marchi In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org On 10/1/25 10:44 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 24/09/2025 09:23, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> On Tue, 23 Sept 2025 at 18:11, Simon Marchi wrote: >>> >>> On 9/23/25 12:49 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: >>>> Both GCC and GDB/binutils now have root editorconfig files. It would >>>> make sense to unify them as this sets the general tone for these >>>> projects. >>>> >>>> ChangeLog: >>>> * .editorconfig: Unify the GCC and GDB/binutils root config. >>> >>> From the point of view of GDB, this looks fine, thanks for doing this. >> >> >> This looks like a vast improvement on the bare-bones config I added >> for GCC, thanks. >> > > I've now pushed this to the GCC repo, but I've not yet heard anything from the binutils maintainers. Do I need to wait for them, or is Simon's ack for GDB enough? > > R. I think you can go ahead and push it, I really don't see how it could be controversial. Simon