Hi,
as described in Bug 17437 the mi interface corrupts cached frames in
the list_arg_or_local function of mi-cmd-stack.c when a pretty-printer
calls a function of the inferior. To prevent this the frame_id is stored
and used to restore the frame after calling list_arg_or_local
- MI regressions were run and no effect through the patch was seen

Is this patch okay?

BR, Thilo


gdb/ChangeLog:

2016-06-02  Thilo Vörtler  <thilo.voertler@coseda-tech.com>

	* mi-cmd-stack.c (list_args_or_locals) the mi interface corrupts 
	cached frames in the list_arg_or_local function of mi-cmd-stack.c when
	a pretty-printer calls a function of the inferior. To prevent this the 
	frame_id is stored and used to restore the frame after calling 
	list_arg_or_local