Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Vrany <jan@vrany.io>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [doc] Update obsolete text about sub-blocks
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 15:52:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d9d1daf606458855523fba9ab23a863c736234b.camel@vrany.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260514195907.1995821-1-tromey@adacore.com>

On Thu, 2026-05-14 at 13:59 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> The manual claims that there is no way to iterate over the sub-blocks
> of a gdb.Block, but this hasn't been true since commit 5166ed9c
> ("gdb/python: add subblocks property to gdb.Block").

Ah, thanks! I missed that.
> 
> This patch removes the obsolete clause and rewords the paragraph.
> ---
>  gdb/doc/python.texi | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/doc/python.texi b/gdb/doc/python.texi
> index 6cafab78d58..663976f1877 100644
> --- a/gdb/doc/python.texi
> +++ b/gdb/doc/python.texi
> @@ -6273,10 +6273,9 @@ The block nested just inside the global block is the @dfn{static
>  block}.  The static block typically holds file-scoped variables and
>  functions.
> 
> -@value{GDBN} provides a method to get a block's superblock, but there
> -is currently no way to examine the sub-blocks of a block, or to
> -iterate over all the blocks in a symbol table (@pxref{Symbol Tables In
> -Python}).
> +There is currently no way to iterate over all the blocks in a symbol
> +table (@pxref{Symbol Tables In Python}), but once a block is found,
> +its super- and sub-blocks can be iterated over.

Reading this, I thought maybe we should drop the part talking about 
iterating all the blocks of a symtab altogether.

When I read it, my first thought was: "This is not true, one can recursively
iterate over all sub-blocks starting with global block." But then I realized
this is not true either - this iterates over all blocks in a compunit, not
in a particular symtab. 

Is it at all possible to get all blocks of given symtab (_not_ compunit)?
I can imagine some complicated way of first finding the symtab for the block
from the superblock chain and then iterating all blocks in a compunit, selecting
only those that are sub-blocks of a block whose Block.function.symtab is the 
particular symtab or something like that. 

To sum it up, I find the part about iterating all blocks in a symtab
a bit confusing.

Thanks, 

Jan

> 
>  Here is a short example that should help explain blocks:
> 
> 
> base-commit: 2ea3f3a7ac2dd6ccd42e96d496b56aa42e7cb993
> --
> 2.54.0


      reply	other threads:[~2026-05-15 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-14 19:59 Tom Tromey
2026-05-15 15:52 ` Jan Vrany [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4d9d1daf606458855523fba9ab23a863c736234b.camel@vrany.io \
    --to=jan@vrany.io \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tromey@adacore.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox