From: Jan Vrany <jan@vrany.io>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [doc] Update obsolete text about sub-blocks
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 15:52:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d9d1daf606458855523fba9ab23a863c736234b.camel@vrany.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260514195907.1995821-1-tromey@adacore.com>
On Thu, 2026-05-14 at 13:59 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> The manual claims that there is no way to iterate over the sub-blocks
> of a gdb.Block, but this hasn't been true since commit 5166ed9c
> ("gdb/python: add subblocks property to gdb.Block").
Ah, thanks! I missed that.
>
> This patch removes the obsolete clause and rewords the paragraph.
> ---
> gdb/doc/python.texi | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/doc/python.texi b/gdb/doc/python.texi
> index 6cafab78d58..663976f1877 100644
> --- a/gdb/doc/python.texi
> +++ b/gdb/doc/python.texi
> @@ -6273,10 +6273,9 @@ The block nested just inside the global block is the @dfn{static
> block}. The static block typically holds file-scoped variables and
> functions.
>
> -@value{GDBN} provides a method to get a block's superblock, but there
> -is currently no way to examine the sub-blocks of a block, or to
> -iterate over all the blocks in a symbol table (@pxref{Symbol Tables In
> -Python}).
> +There is currently no way to iterate over all the blocks in a symbol
> +table (@pxref{Symbol Tables In Python}), but once a block is found,
> +its super- and sub-blocks can be iterated over.
Reading this, I thought maybe we should drop the part talking about
iterating all the blocks of a symtab altogether.
When I read it, my first thought was: "This is not true, one can recursively
iterate over all sub-blocks starting with global block." But then I realized
this is not true either - this iterates over all blocks in a compunit, not
in a particular symtab.
Is it at all possible to get all blocks of given symtab (_not_ compunit)?
I can imagine some complicated way of first finding the symtab for the block
from the superblock chain and then iterating all blocks in a compunit, selecting
only those that are sub-blocks of a block whose Block.function.symtab is the
particular symtab or something like that.
To sum it up, I find the part about iterating all blocks in a symtab
a bit confusing.
Thanks,
Jan
>
> Here is a short example that should help explain blocks:
>
>
> base-commit: 2ea3f3a7ac2dd6ccd42e96d496b56aa42e7cb993
> --
> 2.54.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-15 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-14 19:59 Tom Tromey
2026-05-15 15:52 ` Jan Vrany [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4d9d1daf606458855523fba9ab23a863c736234b.camel@vrany.io \
--to=jan@vrany.io \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@adacore.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox