From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6712 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2016 21:27:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 6697 invoked by uid 89); 27 Apr 2016 21:27:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:328 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 21:27:33 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 184873B71E; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 21:27:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u3RLRUoR023651; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:27:31 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Add Rust language support To: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <1461789279-15996-1-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> From: Pedro Alves Message-ID: <4d07acc7-40de-bf7c-a9fc-2f1c0523de1d@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 21:27:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1461789279-15996-1-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00623.txt.bz2 On 04/27/2016 09:34 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > Here is v2 of the Rust support series. > > I believe I've addressed all the review comments. > > I added a new patch at the end to rename OP_F90_RANGE to OP_RANGE. > That one requires a review. This all looks good to me. -- Pedro Alves