From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 93004 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2017 19:30:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 92932 invoked by uid 89); 16 Jan 2017 19:30:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=sk:insnre, sk:insn-re, UD:insn-reverse.exp X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 19:30:25 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.90.203]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1cTCz2-0002u5-9L from Luis_Gustavo@mentor.com ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 11:30:24 -0800 Received: from [172.30.8.199] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 11:30:20 -0800 Reply-To: Luis Machado Subject: Re: [PATCH] [BZ 21005] Add support for Intel 64 rdrand and rdseed record/replay References: <1484297891-28652-1-git-send-email-lgustavo@codesourcery.com> <20170113121620.GA28060@E107787-LIN> To: Yao Qi CC: From: Luis Machado Message-ID: <4bc2fb38-49be-09cf-bb18-e5c1a9401628@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 19:30:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170113121620.GA28060@E107787-LIN> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203) To svr-orw-mbx-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.90.203) X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-01/txt/msg00306.txt.bz2 On 01/13/2017 06:16 AM, Yao Qi wrote: > On 17-01-13 02:58:11, Luis Machado wrote: >> >> I tested this by hand with quite a few lines of inline asm. I thought we >> had arch-specific tests in testsuite/, but it looks like we don't exercise >> every little instruction with record/replay, so no testcase. Let me know >> if one is required. >> > > gdb.reverse/insn-reverse.exp is intended to exercise each instruction with > record/replay. You can add the instructions in gdb.reverse/insn-reverse.c. > I've sent an RFC for gdb.reverse/insn-reverse.c. Meanwhile i've fixed a gotcha with this patch and have a working testcase, pending the approval/disapproval of the RFC.