From: Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Add label option to proc cu
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:16:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b72733b-4725-9d44-a5e5-0325d51064b6@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62258296-6132-ff23-cd4c-2f2820249a60@polymtl.ca>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1979 bytes --]
On 8/26/21 3:38 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2021-08-26 7:56 a.m., Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We can use current dwarf assembly infrastructure to declare a label that marks
>> the start of the CU header:
>> ...
>> declare_labels header_start_cu_a
>> _section ".debug_info"
>> header_start_cu_a : cu {} {
>> }
>> _section ".debug_info"
>> header_start_cu_b : cu {} {
>> }
>> ...
>> on the condition that we switch to the .debug_info section before, which makes
>> this style of use fragile.
>>
>> Another way to achieve the same is to use the label as generated by the cu
>> proc itself:
>> ...
>> variable _cu_label
>> cu {} {
>> }
>> set header_start_cu_a $_cu_label
>> cu {} {
>> }
>> set header_start_cu_b $_cu_label
>> ...
>> but again that seems fragile given that adding a new CU inbetween will
>> silently result in the wrong value for the label.
>
> And this is done by poking in the internals of the framework, not good.
>
>> Add a label option to proc cu such that we can simply do:
>> ...
>> declare_labels header_start_cu_a
>> cu { label header_start_cu_a } {
>> }
>> cu { label header_start_cu_b } {
>> }
>
> That looks like the right way to do it. But can we make it so the
> caller doesn't need to use declare_labels? For example, with rnglists'
> -post-header-label switch, it's not needed, so I presume it would be
> possible here.
Done.
I looked at -post-header-label, but that puts the burden on the caller
to come up with a unique name. That doesn't work well with proc
dummy_cu being defined like this:
...
proc dummy_cu {} {
# Generate a CU with default options and empty body.
cu {label dummy_cu} {
}
# Generate an .debug_aranges entry for the dummy CU.
aranges {} dummy_cu {
}
}
...
and then being called twice.
Instead, I opted to reuse _cu_label, but rather than poking it's now
exported by the proc.
WDYT?
Thanks,
- Tom
[-- Attachment #2: 0006-gdb-testsuite-Add-label-option-to-proc-cu.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2466 bytes --]
[gdb/testsuite] Add label option to proc cu
We can use current dwarf assembly infrastructure to declare a label that marks
the start of the CU header:
...
declare_labels header_start_cu_a
_section ".debug_info"
header_start_cu_a : cu {} {
}
_section ".debug_info"
header_start_cu_b : cu {} {
}
...
on the condition that we switch to the .debug_info section before, which makes
this style of use fragile.
Another way to achieve the same is to use the label as generated by the cu
proc itself:
...
variable _cu_label
cu {} {
}
set header_start_cu_a $_cu_label
cu {} {
}
set header_start_cu_b $_cu_label
...
but again that seems fragile given that adding a new CU inbetween will
silently result in the wrong value for the label.
Add a label option to proc cu such that we can simply do:
...
cu { label header_start_cu_a } {
}
cu { label header_start_cu_b } {
}
...
Tested on x86_64-linux.
---
gdb/testsuite/lib/dwarf.exp | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/dwarf.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/dwarf.exp
index ce7b5983ab9..4f66b91ccbe 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/dwarf.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/dwarf.exp
@@ -1258,6 +1258,10 @@ namespace eval Dwarf {
# default = default
# fission 0|1 - boolean indicating if generating Fission debug info
# default = 0
+ # label <label>
+ # - string indicating label to be defined at the start
+ # of the CU header.
+ # default = ""
# BODY is Tcl code that emits the DIEs which make up the body of
# the CU. It is evaluated in the caller's context.
proc cu {options body} {
@@ -1278,6 +1282,7 @@ namespace eval Dwarf {
set _cu_is_fission 0
set section ".debug_info"
set _abbrev_section ".debug_abbrev"
+ set label ""
foreach { name value } $options {
set value [uplevel 1 "subst \"$value\""]
@@ -1286,6 +1291,7 @@ namespace eval Dwarf {
version { set _cu_version $value }
addr_size { set _cu_addr_size $value }
fission { set _cu_is_fission $value }
+ label { set label $value }
default { error "unknown option $name" }
}
}
@@ -1318,6 +1324,9 @@ namespace eval Dwarf {
set start_label [_compute_label "cu${cu_num}_start"]
set end_label [_compute_label "cu${cu_num}_end"]
+ upvar $label my_label
+ set my_label $_cu_label
+
define_label $_cu_label
if {$is_64} {
_op .4byte 0xffffffff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-26 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-26 11:56 Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
2021-08-26 13:38 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-08-26 15:16 ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches [this message]
2021-08-27 13:24 ` Tom Tromey
2021-08-27 14:13 ` Tom de Vries via Gdb-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4b72733b-4725-9d44-a5e5-0325d51064b6@suse.de \
--to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
--cc=tdevries@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox