From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17136 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2012 15:12:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 17127 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jun 2012 15:12:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:11:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5MFBjXJ005175 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:11:45 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q5MFBiQ6001153; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:11:45 -0400 Message-ID: <4FE48B30.8070109@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:12:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kratochvil CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not respawn signals, take 2. References: <20120622145525.27114.25720.stgit@brno.lan> <20120622150456.GA5018@host2.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20120622150456.GA5018@host2.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00704.txt.bz2 On 06/22/2012 04:04 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:55:25 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: >> No regressions on x86_64 Fedora 16, native and gdbserver. New tests >> pass. Fixes my unsubmitted test as well. > > Please test it on ARM. This is what you asked me for, the testcase(s) fail > there and I did not yet done this part. The test would fail on ARM because of the whole software single-step issue, which this version doesn't have. Anyone with easy access to GNU/Linux ARM that could test this? Otherwise I'll try to find a machine. -- Pedro Alves