From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Terry Guo <terry.guo@arm.com>,
"'Jonathan Larmour'" <jifl@ecoscentric.com>,
Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org, tromey@redhat.com,
Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
Joey Ye <Joey.Ye@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Enable GDB handle compressed target.xml returned by GDB stub
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD9B96C.9020908@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201206131312.q5DDCUfK028160@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
On 06/13/2012 02:12 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Terry Guo wrote:
>
>> Yes, we need to consider xi:includes which means we have to involve a
>> global state.
>
> Not necessarily; the way I had intended my suggestion to work was that
> GDB always adds ".gz" (or some other suffix if we actually are not
> compatible with the .gz file format) to *every* file it fetches, not
> just to the initial target.xml, but also to other files fetched via
> xi:include statements ...
>
> If the compressed version of the file is not available, GDB would
> then fall back to the original file name (on a file-by-file basis).
That sounds fine. It makes gdb roundtrip to the target twice as
much for tdescs in the limit, but maybe that doesn't matter in
practice.
But note this scheme only works because we're fetching named xml files.
What of other xml objects that aren't filename based? I guess it's
plausible that we'll find other situations where compressing xml
data would be useful. In that perspective, something like the
'try qXfer:features:zread:target.xml first, then
qXfer:features:read:target.xml, etc.' alternative sounded attractive.
Or should we not bother?
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-14 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-11 7:31 Terry Guo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` Jonathan Larmour
2012-06-12 9:37 ` Terry Guo
2012-06-12 12:44 ` Yao Qi
2012-06-12 12:57 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-06-12 16:24 ` Jonathan Larmour
2012-06-13 1:58 ` Terry Guo
2012-06-13 13:42 ` Jonathan Larmour
2012-06-14 0:53 ` Terry Guo
2012-06-13 11:57 ` Terry Guo
2012-06-13 12:26 ` Pedro Alves
2012-06-13 12:51 ` Terry Guo
2012-06-13 13:12 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-06-13 13:47 ` Jonathan Larmour
2012-06-14 1:11 ` Terry Guo
2012-06-14 10:14 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2012-06-14 13:54 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-06-14 14:58 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-06-14 15:38 ` Jonathan Larmour
2012-06-19 7:40 ` Terry Guo
2012-06-22 17:19 ` Jonathan Larmour
2012-06-26 2:39 ` Terry Guo
2012-06-26 3:24 ` Terry Guo
2012-06-26 11:58 ` Jonathan Larmour
2012-06-27 3:42 ` Terry Guo
2012-06-27 21:25 ` Jonathan Larmour
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD9B96C.9020908@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=Joey.Ye@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jifl@ecoscentric.com \
--cc=terry.guo@arm.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=yao@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox