From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15231 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2012 08:52:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 15222 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jun 2012 08:52:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:52:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5D8qaEf019920 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 04:52:36 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5D8qYhn020906; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 04:52:35 -0400 Message-ID: <4FD854D2.6080703@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:52:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yao Qi CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't switch to the event thread early in non-stop mode. References: <20120612184440.29776.25769.stgit@brno.lan> <4FD7E784.1080508@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <4FD7E784.1080508@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00391.txt.bz2 On 06/13/2012 02:06 AM, Yao Qi wrote: > On 06/13/2012 02:44 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> case TARGET_WAITKIND_SPURIOUS: >> if (debug_infrun) >> fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_SPURIOUS\n"); >> + if (!ptid_equal (ecs->ptid, inferior_ptid) >> + && !ptid_equal (ecs->ptid, minus_one_ptid)) >> + context_switch (ecs->ptid); > > Is there any reason to check minus_one_ptid? Yes, linux-thread-db.c returns TARGET_WAITKIND_SPURIOUS with minus_one_ptid. Originated here: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2004-06/msg00073.html -- Pedro Alves