From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13050 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2012 13:13:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 12820 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jun 2012 13:13:39 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:13:22 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1SaRfN-000626-Ij from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 06:13:21 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.39]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 1 Jun 2012 06:13:21 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 06:13:20 -0700 Message-ID: <4FC8BFE4.6@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:13:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Muller CC: Subject: Re: [testsuite] Really ensure printf/fprintf are available in dprintf.exp References: <1338554885-3954-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <001801cd3ff6$de4fd150$9aef73f0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> In-Reply-To: <001801cd3ff6$de4fd150$9aef73f0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 On 06/01/2012 09:02 PM, Pierre Muller wrote: > I was just wondering if this is an expression that I do not know, or if > you simply meant 'bare-metal'? > Hi Pierre, I meant 'bare-metal'. It was a typo. > Also, about the addition of > +#include > in the middle of the source, I also had the impression that > traditionally, C sources group all include's at the top of the source, > but remember that I only program in C for GDB and I am a pascal code > developer otherwise... Usually, if I include a header for a small piece of code, I prefer to place the include near by my code. Otherwise, I'd like to put include at the top of source. It is just my personal habit. Generally, either should be OK. -- Yao (齐尧)