From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30142 invoked by alias); 30 May 2012 20:09:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 30132 invoked by uid 22791); 30 May 2012 20:09:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,TW_EG,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from usmamail.tilera.com (HELO USMAMAIL.TILERA.COM) (12.216.194.151) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 May 2012 20:09:03 +0000 Received: from [10.7.0.51] (10.9.0.23) by USMAExch2.tad.internal.tilera.com (10.3.0.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.0.694.0; Wed, 30 May 2012 16:09:02 -0400 Message-ID: <4FC67E5E.20507@tilera.com> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 20:09:00 -0000 From: Jeff Kenton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves CC: Joel Brobecker , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for Tilera TILE-Gx processor (part 1/3: gdb) References: <4FAD39A1.1000209@tilera.com> <20120514162046.GI10253@adacore.com> <4FBA4FD2.9090108@tilera.com> <4FBD1F67.9090609@redhat.com> <4FBE8B5E.6050800@tilera.com> <4FBFA26F.20002@redhat.com> <4FC4EA20.1040201@tilera.com> <4FC67B1C.6040700@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4FC67B1C.6040700@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg01055.txt.bz2 On 05/30/2012 03:55 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > Please always send patches against the current mainline; the "tilegx_return_value" > function had a function signature that is no longer correct in mainline, and thus > caused an --enable-targets=all build to fail. I've fixed it. > > I've also went through the patch and updated a series of formatting > issues (tabs/spaces, some alignments, etc.) and a few typos/pastos, as it was more > efficient that more back and forth. ;-) I've also done a couple other minor > things, like adding multiple inclusion guards to tilegx-tdep.h. > > Here's the patch as checked in. > > Thank you. --jeff kenton