From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11541 invoked by alias); 26 May 2012 11:08:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 11532 invoked by uid 22791); 26 May 2012 11:08:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 May 2012 11:08:39 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1SYErO-0006iG-OW from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Sat, 26 May 2012 04:08:38 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-05.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.43]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 26 May 2012 04:08:16 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-05.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Sat, 26 May 2012 04:08:37 -0700 Message-ID: <4FC0B9B2.2070402@codesourcery.com> Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 11:08:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves CC: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/14] Run all-stop on non-stop target References: <1336050869-29605-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <4FA294B7.1040506@redhat.com> <4FA298D4.7010305@codesourcery.com> <4FAAAD6C.1010507@redhat.com> <4FABAFB3.2000503@codesourcery.com> <4FABCED2.4010405@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4FABCED2.4010405@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00979.txt.bz2 On 05/10/2012 10:21 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 05/10/2012 01:08 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > >> Yes, I saw them as well on both native gdb and remote. This is the last >> set problems of on async. > > > There were PRs filed recently too. PR13869 at least. > Are you suggesting that this patch series can't go in until these async-related PR are fixed? I browsed bugzilla, and there are 27 bugs related on async. I tried to fix one or two, and find it is not a small piece of work. Can we let this series go in without setting target-async on in default? If it is OK, I'll rebase my tree to latest CVS trunk, and post patches again. Then, we can push ITSET related code into CVS gradually, and fix async bugs in parallel. ITSET is a great feature, and very competitive. I'd like to put it into GDB as soon as possible, and let users to have a try earlier. -- Yao (齐尧)