From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19591 invoked by alias); 25 May 2012 08:51:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 19581 invoked by uid 22791); 25 May 2012 08:51:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 May 2012 08:50:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4P8odnD014966 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 25 May 2012 04:50:39 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4P8obiV012483; Fri, 25 May 2012 04:50:38 -0400 Message-ID: <4FBF47DD.4030100@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 08:51:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Evans CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, ratmice@gmail.com Subject: Re: [RFA] massively speed up "info var foo" on large programs References: <20120524175852.D38381E139C@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00961.txt.bz2 On 05/25/2012 09:21 AM, Doug Evans wrote: > > The output is different from the previous code, I didn't take into > account the symbols that gdb creates for @plt entries. I think if we > want to continue to provide the current output, we should add an > option to "info var|fun|type" to produce it: the normal case shouldn't > be that slow. Different how? The patch has no testsuite updates, so the email reader is left wondering. ;-) -- Pedro Alves