From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30461 invoked by alias); 23 May 2012 15:27:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 30450 invoked by uid 22791); 23 May 2012 15:27:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 May 2012 15:26:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4NFQgsH007497 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 23 May 2012 11:26:42 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4NFQe0D008312; Wed, 23 May 2012 11:26:41 -0400 Message-ID: <4FBD01B0.5050108@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 15:27:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Evans CC: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: New ARI warning Wed May 23 01:55:03 UTC 2012 References: <20120523015503.GA25312@sourceware.org> <4fbc9d77.0853b40a.641e.ffff90dbSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00897.txt.bz2 On 05/23/2012 04:01 PM, Doug Evans wrote: > For reference sake, > An alternative is to use {,u}int64_t, does ARI have any rule on them? If there is, it's outdated. We pick up stdint.h/inttypes.h from gnulib, so those types are now available on all hosts. If not, it's a gnulib problem. I suggest to use those types, because libiberty itself has recently began assuming uintptr_t through either stdint.h or inttypes.h is available. I see no reason to consider 128 types in a libiberty header/interface at this point. It'll be a long while (decades?) before that could be considered portable. > It's been in use in at least findcmd.c since gdb 7.0 [IIUC] > (perhaps errantly, but nevertheless ...). -- Pedro Alves