From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18702 invoked by alias); 22 May 2012 15:18:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 18690 invoked by uid 22791); 22 May 2012 15:18:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 May 2012 15:18:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4MFIbYK009231 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 22 May 2012 11:18:37 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q4MFIaxU027093; Tue, 22 May 2012 11:18:36 -0400 Message-ID: <4FBBAE4B.3030306@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 15:18:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Muller CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA-v3/ARI fix] Remove use of abort function in common/buffer.c References: <4fbb59b7.44e2440a.48c4.ffffab13SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <4FBB5D9B.5070202@redhat.com> <000c01cd3813$32090b40$961b21c0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <20120522121832.GC5492@adacore.com> <4FBB88C5.6070900@redhat.com> <002101cd382d$a5eb2fb0$f1c18f10$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> In-Reply-To: <002101cd382d$a5eb2fb0$f1c18f10$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00825.txt.bz2 On 05/22/2012 04:14 PM, Pierre Muller wrote: > OK for that even simpler patch? OK. Thanks. -- Pedro Alves