From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25017 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2012 18:43:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 25006 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Apr 2012 18:43:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:43:33 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3UIhTFp000435 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:43:29 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3UIhN4A006433; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:43:24 -0400 Message-ID: <4F9EDD4B.3020409@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 18:44:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Kenton CC: Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for Tilera TILE-Gx processor (part 2/2: gdb) References: <4F9066C5.30501@tilera.com> <4F917C1F.3060804@codesourcery.com> <4F917F7F.9030601@tilera.com> In-Reply-To: <4F917F7F.9030601@tilera.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg01084.txt.bz2 I meant to reply to this before, but it slipped... On 04/20/2012 04:23 PM, Jeff Kenton wrote: > On 04/20/2012 11:09 AM, Yao Qi wrote: >> I don't know tile-gx process at all, but some comments on code style. > > Thank you for the comments. I will make those changes. > >> Last but not least, it is great if you can post the gdb testsuite result. -- Yao (齐尧) > > === gdb Summary === > > # of expected passes 18181 > # of unexpected failures 625 Did you look at what is causing these hundreds of failures? Although there are thousands of passes, such high failure rate is usually indicative of something badly borked. You'd be surprised at how far in testsuite results you can get with a gdb that manages to loads programs, but is a brick at actually debugging live programs ... > # of expected failures 100 > # of known failures 59 > # of untested testcases 12 > # of unresolved testcases 4 > # of unsupported tests 118 > /gdb_tests/gdb/build/gdb/testsuite/../../gdb/gdb version 7.4.50.20120410 -nw -nx -data-directory /gdb_tests/gdb/build/gdb/testsuite/../data-directory -- Pedro Alves