From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-90286-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 13138 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2012 18:11:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 13117 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Apr 2012 18:11:41 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from usmamail.tilera.com (HELO USMAMAIL.TILERA.COM) (206.83.70.75)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:11:28 +0000
Received: from [10.7.0.51] (10.9.0.23) by USMAExch2.tad.internal.tilera.com (10.3.0.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.0.694.0; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:11:27 -0400
Message-ID: <4F96ECCF.7060109@tilera.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:47:00 -0000
From: Jeff Kenton <jkenton@tilera.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
CC: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for Tilera TILE-Gx processor (part 1/2: gdb)
References: <4F906647.8090303@tilera.com> <20120420124306.GJ2852@adacore.com> <4F95B46D.1070101@tilera.com> <4F96D15B.9090506@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F96D15B.9090506@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00821.txt.bz2

On 04/24/2012 12:14 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Could you please split the series further one more time (and resubmit 
> as a new thread, not as a reply to this one)? I'd like to see the 
> host-independent tdep bits split out from the linux native debugger 
> support (the nat bits). So you'll end up with 3 patches (you should be 
> able to debug against gdbserver with just the tdep bits, and the 
> gdbserver bits, for example.). That'll make it easier to see such 
> issues and what else might need adjustment to current GDB's way of 
> doing things. 

Thank you for all the comments.  I will try to have them done and 
re-submit by the end of the week.

--jeff kenton