From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25186 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2012 11:14:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 25176 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2012 11:14:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:13:57 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3KBDaUO011652 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 20 Apr 2012 07:13:36 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3KBDYFR027280; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 07:13:34 -0400 Message-ID: <4F9144DE.7030909@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:44:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Larmour CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Ilija Kocho , Terry Guo Subject: Re: [patch] Add support for VFP d16 layout for Cortex-M4 References: <4F902B4E.9070704@eCosCentric.com> In-Reply-To: <4F902B4E.9070704@eCosCentric.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00670.txt.bz2 On 04/19/2012 04:12 PM, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > > There's a couple of trivial little fixes from earlier changes too (a > comment and missing entries in features/Makefile). FAOD I have > write-after-approval commit perms. Please split these into separate patches, and post as separate threads, with their own standalone descriptions. They're pre-approved, so go ahead and check them in. But for this, > * features/Makefile: Add arm-with-m* entries currently missing. Say instead: * features/Makefile (WHICH): Add arm-with-m and arm-with-m-fpa-layout. -- Pedro Alves