From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3064 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2012 10:17:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 3038 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Apr 2012 10:17:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:17:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3IAH5Sn008808 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:17:05 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3IAH3sO023642; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 06:17:03 -0400 Message-ID: <4F8E949E.1000702@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 10:52:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kratochvil CC: Joel Brobecker , Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Fix in-src-tree builds by making gdbserver/gnulib/ a separate library (a la libiberty, etc.), and adding ACX_CONFIGURE_DIR. References: <4F88F188.1050401@codesourcery.com> <20120415164917.GA2861@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F8BFB25.5030808@redhat.com> <4F8C5794.5050302@redhat.com> <20120416174339.GA11991@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F8D9F1E.2070203@redhat.com> <20120417170521.GA9906@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F8DA538.1060000@redhat.com> <20120417232552.GS2852@adacore.com> <4F8E860F.8050906@redhat.com> <20120418092859.GA5887@host2.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20120418092859.GA5887@host2.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00554.txt.bz2 On 04/18/2012 10:28 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:14:55 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: >> Clearly we'll not be able to make everybody happy. >> I understood Jan's comment as a suggestion, not an objection, so >> I'll take the path of least effort, and get this over with. > > To make clear I am curious how anyone can have two different directories of > the same name, I often use things like "find src -name foo" and do something > with it. I see there exist different preferences. Okay, thinking some more, gnulib/import isn't that bad. I wrote initially: On 04/17/2012 05:49 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > I thought of: > > gnulib/src/ > gnulib/import/ > > but that ends up with the confusing: > > GNULIB_CFLAGS=-I$(srcdir)/gnulib/src -I$(GNULIB_BUILDDIR)/src > > Confusing because $(GNULIB_BUILDDIR)/src isn't really src, but the > built libgnu.a and the generated headers. But: GNULIB_CFLAGS=-I$(srcdir)/gnulib/import -I$(GNULIB_BUILDDIR)/import isn't that confusing. $(GNULIB_BUILDDIR)/import is the build of the gnulib import. Would that make everybody happy? -- Pedro Alves