From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28736 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2012 22:57:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 28726 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Apr 2012 22:57:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net (HELO elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net) (209.86.89.67) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:57:37 +0000 Received: from [68.96.200.16] (helo=macbook2.local) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1SJurY-0001U8-V9 for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:57:37 -0400 Message-ID: <4F8CA3DB.3090005@earthlink.net> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:19:00 -0000 From: Stan Shebs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Fix in-src-tree builds by making gdbserver/gnulib/ a separate library (a la libiberty, etc.), and adding ACX_CONFIGURE_DIR. References: <1334127046-27627-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <20120413212559.GA5867@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F88F188.1050401@codesourcery.com> <20120415164917.GA2861@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F8BFB25.5030808@redhat.com> <4F8C5794.5050302@redhat.com> <87vckzzbss.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4F8C82A6.5000104@redhat.com> <20120416211912.GJ2852@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20120416211912.GJ2852@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: ae6f8838ff913eba0cc1426638a40ef67e972de0d01da9403e35135b053dbb6592fb072ac1be3363350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00443.txt.bz2 On 4/16/12 2:19 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Likewise. The code is already written, so might as well use it... > > Perhaps we'll just want to fork away from top-level src, and have > our own independent src (which, btw, would pave the way for a switch > to a better VCS). It raises the problem of the synchronization > with binutils, of course, but other than that, do we really need > to have the same src as all the other projects? Do we really benefit > from that? > It *is* beneficial to get BFD checkins automatically. However, I think we'd be OK with a daily pull from a binutils repo, it's not often that a GDB change is revlocked to a BFD version. (And of course by "BFD" I also mean opcodes etc as well :-) ) Stan