From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1450 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2012 16:53:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 1438 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Apr 2012 16:53:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:53:31 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3CGrTjx018488 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:53:29 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3CGrS8V021462; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:53:28 -0400 Message-ID: <4F870888.9020803@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:20:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H.J. Lu" CC: GDB Subject: Re: PATCH: PR gdb/13969: GDBserver doesn't check unsupported binary References: <20120411191609.GA466@intel.com> <4F86D411.4000100@redhat.com> <4F86FB82.7030308@redhat.com> <4F8704F9.9040309@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00313.txt.bz2 On 04/12/2012 05:45 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > x32 ptrace returns x32 siginfo, ok. > which is compatible with ia32 inferior I believe clock_t will be 64-bit with x32, however, right? If so, amd64-linux-nat.c:compat_siginfo_from_siginfo|siginfo_from_compat_siginfo (and the gdbserver equivalents) will need adjustment (for the 64-bit X x32 case). This is something most probably not caught by the testsuite. -- Pedro Alves