From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5248 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2012 05:16:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 5240 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Apr 2012 05:16:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 05:16:34 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1SICOV-0006aK-V5 from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:16:31 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.96.206]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:16:31 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-02.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.96.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 22:16:27 -0700 Message-ID: <4F866526.8070100@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 05:33:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Evans CC: Subject: Re: [PATCH] breakpoint always inserted in record target References: <1334149619-2738-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00276.txt.bz2 On 04/12/2012 12:45 PM, Doug Evans wrote: > Plus, can you write a testcase? In existing test cases in gdb.reverse, breakpoints are inserted into inferior. Without this patch, when run gdb.reverse/i386-sse-reverse.exp (turning on always inserted mode), we get a lot fails. When this patch applied, fails go away. I think this patch is exercised by this case. I should mention this fixed fails in my patch post. What do you want to test beyond my description above? -- Yao (齐尧)