From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26524 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2012 05:31:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 26510 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Mar 2012 05:31:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 05:30:51 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2K5UmHr027312 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 20 Mar 2012 01:30:48 -0400 Received: from valrhona.uglyboxes.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2K5Uj6O019240 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Mar 2012 01:30:47 -0400 Message-ID: <4F681604.1040906@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 05:31:00 -0000 From: Keith Seitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA 1/3] Linespec rewrite: Parsing References: <4F67A319.4090608@redhat.com> <83sjh40vu4.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83sjh40vu4.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00734.txt.bz2 On 03/19/2012 08:56 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:20:25 -0700 >> From: Keith Seitz >> >> - This patch does make one incompatible change with current linespec >> handling: quoting. Users may not quote multiple "pieces" of the linespec >> anymore. [Although users may still use either \' or \".] > > This incompatibility cannot go without some change to documentation, > both in the user manual and in NEWS. The documentation doesn't mention linespecs very much, so I will look into writing an appropriate expansion of that section of the manual in the morning [and a NEWS entry]. >> Windows drive letters are okay, too. > > Not sure what this means. Do they require quoting or not? Oh, sorry. No, linespecs with drive letters do not require quoting (no change from current behavior). Keith