From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-88965-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5595 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2012 07:31:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 5586 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Mar 2012 07:31:24 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0	tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY,RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-iy0-f169.google.com) (209.85.210.169)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:31:10 +0000
Received: by iajr24 with SMTP id r24so5969234iaj.0        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.77.170 with SMTP id t10mr12053688igw.35.1331883069532;        Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [193.168.1.102] ([220.191.84.35])        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id en8sm1758922igc.7.2012.03.16.00.31.05        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);        Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4F62EC5C.1050609@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 07:31:00 -0000
From: asmwarrior <asmwarrior@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [msys+mingw] build error [-Werror=uninitialized]
References: <4F629DE1.8060002@gmail.com> <4F62EAC8.8020000@codesourcery.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F62EAC8.8020000@codesourcery.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00587.txt.bz2

On 2012-3-16 15:24, Yao Qi wrote:
> I didn't see any other errors.  What error did you see even after you
> setting `addr' to 0?
See:

TRY_CATCH (ex, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
     {
       addr = value_as_address (vfn);
     }
Which means addr is set before passed to print_function_pointer_address() call.
So I'm not sure why gcc report such warning.

Yuanhui Zhang