From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16849 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2012 15:52:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 16838 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Mar 2012 15:52:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:52:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2FFqDI8004019 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:52:13 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2FFqBcP024986; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:52:11 -0400 Message-ID: <4F62102B.5040306@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:52:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: Pedro Alves , Jan Kratochvil , muller@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ARI patch] Fix gawk-4.0 warning References: <20120314201501.GA1412@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120314211151.GK2853@adacore.com> <4F61C1E1.6040809@redhat.com> <20120315152450.GN2853@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20120315152450.GN2853@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00546.txt.bz2 On 03/15/2012 03:24 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >>> Pierre Muller has been the most active contributor in that area. >>> I see him as the de-facto maintainer, or rather "authorized committer". >>> These files are not part of the GDB repository, so could be maintained >>> a little differently, or we could say they fall under the GMs umbrella, >>> or ask Pierre if he wants to be the maintainer.... >> >> I thought he already was the maintainer? Did we forget to send an >> announcement when it happened? I can't find it... > > That's a good correction. He is, in fact, the Maintainer, since > the end of March 2009. It probably flew under the radar because > the script isn't in the same repo as GDB, I am not sure anymore. > > We should document this: Howzabout we start a MAINTAINERS file in > the "ss" repo as well? Fine with me, fwiw. Didn't we talk at some point about moving the script over to the GDB repo? It'd be nice to have it a bit more integrated with GDB so people more easily run it locally.. -- Pedro Alves