From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6654 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2012 15:40:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 6644 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Mar 2012 15:40:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:40:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2FFe8sf030816 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:40:35 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2FFe6Rf007709; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:40:07 -0400 Message-ID: <4F620D56.60006@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:40:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kratochvil CC: Tom Tromey , Sergio Durigan Junior , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Implement new features needed for handling SystemTap probes References: <20120310192054.GA27097@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87obs1o8ry.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120312231514.GA10376@host2.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20120312231514.GA10376@host2.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00543.txt.bz2 On 03/12/2012 11:15 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > It would also make it more easy to implement breakpoints on UST addresses; > although I do not have ust.h available here to examine that possibility more. It's quite possible. We just need to use target_static_tracepoint_markers_by_strid to get the address of a marker. -- Pedro Alves