From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20602 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2012 10:35:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 20492 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Mar 2012 10:35:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:35:19 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2FAYvr2004449 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:34:57 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2FAYtPD013170; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 06:34:56 -0400 Message-ID: <4F61C5CF.8050607@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:35:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Problem after hitting breakpoint on Windows (with GDBserver) References: <1331602756-23567-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <1331602756-23567-2-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <4F5F6187.50209@redhat.com> <20120313215956.GT2853@adacore.com> <4F5FD262.9030708@redhat.com> <20120314215024.GL2853@adacore.com> <20120315010336.GM2853@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20120315010336.GM2853@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00528.txt.bz2 On 03/15/2012 01:03 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > And attached is the simplified version without the extra comments. > Tested on x86_64-linux, with and without GDBserver... I have no further comments. Looks good to me. Thanks. -- Pedro Alves