From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6147 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2012 22:21:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 6136 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Mar 2012 22:21:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:20:54 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2DMKgtc023565 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:20:43 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2DMKeYH027225; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:20:41 -0400 Message-ID: <4F5FC838.30809@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 22:21:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves CC: Hui Zhu , Hui Zhu , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Yao Qi Subject: Re: Fix error when gdb connect to a stub that tracepoint is running[1/2] Add a flag initialized to struct trace_status References: <4F4F8BE2.7030503@mentor.com> <4F4FB2F9.80200@redhat.com> <4F4FC4AD.3020501@redhat.com> <4F5F4F9C.2080601@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4F5F4F9C.2080601@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00451.txt.bz2 On 03/13/2012 01:46 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> And I found that this issue affect 7.4 too. I suggest commit this >> patch to 7.4 branch too. > > > It'd be good to have a testcase. ;-) I'm not sure if 7.4 has all the > bits necessary? I'll check it out. I've confirmed that just these patches were needed to fix this. I've checked them in in the 7.4 branch now. -- Pedro Alves