From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12202 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2012 23:15:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 12194 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Mar 2012 23:15:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:15:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2CNFIl1026869 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:15:18 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2CNFGNV014575; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:15:17 -0400 Message-ID: <4F5E8384.3000905@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:15:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: Stan Shebs , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: move *-stub.c to stubs/ References: <4F5E78ED.8050009@earthlink.net> <20120312230434.GQ2853@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20120312230434.GQ2853@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00422.txt.bz2 On 03/12/2012 11:04 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> Just now noticing this - do we really want a separate ChangeLog in >> the subdir? The last time it came up, people seemed to want fewer >> ChangeLogs, not more. > > That's a good point. Any objection to fixing this? That came in in the context of docs and tests. But in this case, does it really make sense to have essentially separate programs' logs in gdb's ChangeLog? IMO, it doesn't. IMO, it kind of follows exactly from putting the files in their own dir. They're separate things, not part of GDB. -- Pedro Alves