From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17606 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2012 14:24:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 17593 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Mar 2012 14:24:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:24:23 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q25EOMvJ028319 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 5 Mar 2012 09:24:22 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q25EOKBC028271; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 09:24:21 -0500 Message-ID: <4F54CC94.5080407@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:24:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H.J. Lu" CC: GDB Patches , Mark Kettenis Subject: Re: AVX and unavailable registers, fix system-gcore.exp References: <4F21A489.2080200@redhat.com> <4F4BD008.1060909@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00134.txt.bz2 On 03/02/2012 09:49 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> On 02/27/2012 06:04 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> >>>> 2012-01-26 Pedro Alves >>>> >>>> * i387-tdep.c (i387_supply_xsave): If we have an xsave buffer, and >>>> the register state is clear, supply explicit zero, instead of >>>> marking the register unavailable. >>> >>> This fixes 7.3/7.4 regression: >>> >>> http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13766 >> >> Thanks for confirming. Since you agree with the patch, I'll check it in in >> a few days unless I hear otherwise. I'll post a separate RFC patch proposing >> to remove the NULL REGS handling: > > Has this fix been checked in? It's in now. -- Pedro Alves