From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30202 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2012 17:13:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 30193 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Feb 2012 17:13:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:13:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1SHCwEe018019 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:12:58 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1SHCu9l023400; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:12:57 -0500 Message-ID: <4F4D0B18.5040402@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:27:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Doug Evans , Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: Ping: [PATCH] testsuite: Add (extensive) hardware breakpoint testing References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00664.txt.bz2 On 02/27/2012 09:04 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Hi, > > Where are we with this proposal of mine: > > http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-11/msg00316.html > > ? Here's another update to add changes corresponding to recent > adjustments to break.exp and to accomodate the year roll-over: I read the thread from the start, and I diffed the new proposed test against break.exp, and I think we should go ahead and put this in. Only a couple remarks below. > +# Copyright 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. I think dropping the original copyright years was a mistake. > +if { [prepare_for_testing hbreak2.exp "break" {break.c break1.c} {debug nowarnings}] } { s/"break"/"hbreak2", so that running this test doesn't overwrite break.exp's binary. More instances of this. -- Pedro Alves