From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18165 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2012 16:49:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 18152 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Feb 2012 16:49:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:49:39 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1OGncQE010682 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:49:39 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1OGnbiv020375; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:49:38 -0500 Message-ID: <4F47BFA1.2050603@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:16:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120131 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aleksandar Ristovski CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] Assert when 'break' with no arguments References: <20120214185333.GB14803@adacore.com> <4F3AB4AE.2010504@qnx.com> <4F3AC7A9.3020805@qnx.com> <4F47AFA8.7070302@redhat.com> <4F47B2A8.3070202@qnx.com> <4F47B53D.8050003@redhat.com> <4F47B7C0.2040504@qnx.com> In-Reply-To: <4F47B7C0.2040504@qnx.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00588.txt.bz2 On 02/24/2012 04:16 PM, Aleksandar Ristovski wrote: > I understand your motive; strictly speaking, this is more correct, so fine by me. > > The error is not supposed to happen anyway :-) Yeah :-) I've ran the testsuite, just in case, and applied it, with: 2012-02-24 Pedro Alves * stack.c (set_last_displayed_sal): Issue internal_error instead of warning, and issue it after clearing the last displayed sal. Thanks, -- Pedro Alves