From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1983 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2012 16:09:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 1966 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Feb 2012 16:09:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_DJ,TW_GP,TW_JG,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:09:07 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1OG8xgT025503 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:08:59 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1OG8vmi024471; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:08:58 -0500 Message-ID: <4F47B619.1030009@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:16:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120131 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Muller CC: "'Chet Ramey'" , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [Bug-readline] PING [RFA] Fix djgpp gdb-7.4 (and probably trunk) build failure in readline References: <008101ccdde8$d71f84e0$855e8ea0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <4f479be8.5febd80a.205f.44b6SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <4F47A198.7010604@case.edu> <4f47b42b.a426440a.768a.685aSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: <4f47b42b.a426440a.768a.685aSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00582.txt.bz2 On 02/24/2012 03:59 PM, Pierre Muller wrote: > may I interpret Chet's answer as an official approval > for that patch to current gdb cvs? > (As he is not a global GDB maintainer, I would rather get it directly from you...) > Or do you still prefer to postpone this? Go ahead and apply your patch to gdb cvs. -- Pedro Alves