From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17718 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2012 12:20:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 17703 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Feb 2012 12:20:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:20:03 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1S0u82-00032F-GM from Luis_Gustavo@mentor.com ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 04:20:02 -0800 Received: from NA1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.181]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 24 Feb 2012 04:19:57 -0800 Received: from [0.0.0.0] ([172.16.63.104]) by NA1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 24 Feb 2012 04:20:00 -0800 Message-ID: <4F47808D.2050605@mentor.com> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:21:00 -0000 From: Luis Gustavo Reply-To: "Gustavo, Luis" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110922 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Stan Shebs Subject: Re: [rfc target-side break conditions ] Testcase References: <4F33026A.4000307@mentor.com> <4F3A6FCC.7050906@redhat.com> <4F4509C0.9010406@mentor.com> <4F467B7F.6020500@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4F467B7F.6020500@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00543.txt.bz2 On 02/23/2012 03:46 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 02/22/2012 03:29 PM, Luis Gustavo wrote: > >> Fixed. Thanks for the input. > > Welcome. > >> I apologize for the poor expect hackery. > > No need for that. We all learn this stuff as we go. > > Okay, with ... > >> +gdb_test_multiple $test_target $test_target { >> + -re $warning$gdb_prompt { > > -re "$warning$gdb_prompt $" { > > unless there's a special requirement to allow things after the prompt. Not really. We just want to make sure target-side evaluation shows as unsupported when doing native GDB debugging. Thanks, Luis