From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11015 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2012 17:46:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 10986 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Feb 2012 17:46:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:46:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1NHkfaS015565 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:46:41 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1NHkdUZ024491; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:46:40 -0500 Message-ID: <4F467B7F.6020500@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:51:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120131 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Gustavo, Luis" CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Stan Shebs Subject: Re: [rfc target-side break conditions ] Testcase References: <4F33026A.4000307@mentor.com> <4F3A6FCC.7050906@redhat.com> <4F4509C0.9010406@mentor.com> In-Reply-To: <4F4509C0.9010406@mentor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00510.txt.bz2 On 02/22/2012 03:29 PM, Luis Gustavo wrote: > Fixed. Thanks for the input. Welcome. > I apologize for the poor expect hackery. No need for that. We all learn this stuff as we go. Okay, with ... > +gdb_test_multiple $test_target $test_target { > + -re $warning$gdb_prompt { -re "$warning$gdb_prompt $" { unless there's a special requirement to allow things after the prompt. Thanks, -- Pedro Alves