From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16179 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2012 19:17:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 16170 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Feb 2012 19:17:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:17:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1LJHQFs020615 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:17:29 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1LIvmLB014953; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:57:49 -0500 Message-ID: <4F43E92C.8070904@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:28:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120131 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kratochvil CC: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: testsuite: prefix handling References: <20120217193546.10029.74207.stgit@hit-nxdomain.opendns.com> <20120217193648.10029.26589.stgit@hit-nxdomain.opendns.com> <87pqdd9pjs.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4F3EBEAC.1070805@redhat.com> <87k43l87vb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4F43B6A5.3010900@redhat.com> <20120221181708.GA2538@host2.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20120221181708.GA2538@host2.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00445.txt.bz2 On 02/21/2012 06:17 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > As new testcase are in many cases created by copying existing ones the wrong > still will be spreading in the future. Sure there are many cases of such > leftover old styles in the GDB codebase. Well, help appreciated. -- Pedro Alves