From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 681 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2012 12:37:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 652 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Feb 2012 12:37:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 12:37:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1KCbSuK015675 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 07:37:28 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1KCbRcZ023245; Mon, 20 Feb 2012 07:37:27 -0500 Message-ID: <4F423E87.5030508@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:27:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120131 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gdb.threads/attach-into-signal.exp: cleanup References: <20120217193546.10029.74207.stgit@hit-nxdomain.opendns.com> <20120217193648.10029.26589.stgit@hit-nxdomain.opendns.com> <87pqdd9pjs.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4F3EBEAC.1070805@redhat.com> <87k43l87vb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87k43l87vb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00403.txt.bz2 [On lappend vs append.] Since this isn't an issue unique to this test, I'm going ahead and checking in the patch as is. We can handle the normalizing of the whole testsuite's handling of pf_prefix as a separate change. -- Pedro Alves