Re: wrong bfd recognized

Joel Brobecker
2011-12-29T12:18:17Z

Luca

> > Could you write a ChangeLog entry for your patch?
> > I will put it in.
[...]
> Ok. A possible entry could be:
>
> improved bfd local static library detection in the configure script

Unfortunately, this is not what a ChangeLog entry should look like.
I suspect you thought that we were asking for some text to be used
as revision history? Here is what a ChangeLog entry looks like:

2011-12-27 Doug Evans <dje@google.com>

* dwarf2read.c (struct dwarf2_cu): Delete members first_fn, last_fn,
cached_fn.
(struct function_range): Delete.
(initialize_cu_func_list, add_to_cu_func_list): Delete. All callers
updated.
(check_cu_functions): Ditto.

You can have a look at the couple of sections that explain ChangeLogs
in the GNU Coding Standards (the link brings you directly to the
relevant section):

http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#Change-Logs

Please let me know if you have any problems creating one and I will
write it for you (this time!).

--
Joel