From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4836 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2012 22:14:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 4793 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Feb 2012 22:14:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net (HELO elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net) (209.86.89.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:14:34 +0000 Received: from [70.170.59.51] (helo=macbook2.local) by elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1RutJ3-0002IH-Vg for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:14:34 -0500 Message-ID: <4F31A249.9000800@earthlink.net> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:14:00 -0000 From: Stan Shebs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc target-side break conditions 5/5 v2] GDBServer-side changes References: <4F230A29.3060404@mentor.com> In-Reply-To: <4F230A29.3060404@mentor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: ae6f8838ff913eba0cc1426638a40ef67e972de0d01da940d56919cc0da826fd130bcfdaf7123e66350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00093.txt.bz2 On 1/27/12 12:33 PM, Luis Gustavo wrote: > This updated patch addresses all the comments made before and also > handles the updated Z packet format with the "conditions" marker. > > I've added a function that parses (a generic set of) options passed > through the Z packets. This all looks ready to go in, modulo my syntax characters comment from earlier. Incidentally, don't we officially say "GDBserver" rather than "GDBServer"? Stan