Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: Hui Zhu <hui_zhu@mentor.com>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix error when gdb connect to a stub that tracepoint is running[1/2] reset current_trace_status in the begin of remote_start_remote
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F27E75D.9080303@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F27CFCA.9050203@mentor.com>

On 01/31/2012 07:26 PM, Hui Zhu wrote:
> I have 2 ideas with your mail:
> 1. If we want move merge_uploaded_tracepoints (&uploaded_tps); to the
> begin, I think all the code about tracepoint should move to the begin of
> this function.
> 
>   /* Possibly the target has been engaged in a trace run started
>      previously; find out where things are at.  */
>   if (remote_get_trace_status (current_trace_status ()) != -1)
>     {
>       struct uploaded_tp *uploaded_tps = NULL;
>       struct uploaded_tsv *uploaded_tsvs = NULL;
> 
>       if (current_trace_status ()->running)
>     printf_filtered (_("Trace is already running on the target.\n"));
> 
>       /* Get trace state variables first, they may be checked when
>      parsing uploaded commands.  */
> 
>       remote_upload_trace_state_variables (&uploaded_tsvs);
> 
>       merge_uploaded_trace_state_variables (&uploaded_tsvs);
> 
>       remote_upload_tracepoints (&uploaded_tps);
> 
>       merge_uploaded_tracepoints (&uploaded_tps);
>     }
> 

Yes, that is what I did in my patch.  They should be moved as a whole.

> 2.  But I think move the code before start_remote is not very well.
> Because the code before tracepoint code do a lot of init work, maybe
> move it will bring more issues to current code.

Changing the order of code in a large function (remote_start_remote)
makes me feel a little uncomfortable.  I'll think of it carefully.

-- 
Yao (齐尧)


  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-31 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-31  2:05 Hui Zhu
2012-01-31 11:26 ` Yao Qi
2012-01-31 13:06   ` Hui Zhu
2012-01-31 16:49     ` Yao Qi [this message]
2012-02-08 18:31   ` Pedro Alves
2012-02-10  7:50     ` Hui Zhu
2012-02-10  7:54       ` Hui Zhu
2012-02-17  1:26         ` Hui Zhu
2012-02-17  1:21       ` Hui Zhu
2012-02-08  8:39 ` Hui Zhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F27E75D.9080303@codesourcery.com \
    --to=yao@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=hui_zhu@mentor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox