From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28009 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2012 20:10:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 27998 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jan 2012 20:10:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_OC,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:09:50 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0HK9QwI008443 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:09:26 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0HK9OaP004025; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:09:25 -0500 Message-ID: <4F15D574.1070208@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:19:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ulrich Weigand CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com Subject: Re: [rfc v3][0/6] Remote /proc file access References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00637.txt.bz2 On 01/17/2012 07:40 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Hello, > > this implements the suggestions I received as feedback from > the v2 version of the patch series. > > I've tested this series on i386 native and remote, as well as > on ARM remotely; no change to the previous version. > > Joel, would you mind re-running the tests on a procfs target > since this patch does change the procfs.c file, which I cannot > test ... Thanks! Looks good to me. I have no further comments now. Thanks again. -- Pedro Alves