From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2686 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2012 14:37:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 2534 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jan 2012 14:37:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:37:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0DEbEhN024275 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 13 Jan 2012 09:37:14 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0DEbCj6002506; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 09:37:13 -0500 Message-ID: <4F104198.3020405@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:44:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey CC: Eli Zaretskii , luis_gustavo@mentor.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC stub-side break conditions 3/5] GDB-side changes References: <4F05BA10.3090107@mentor.com> <83y5tlnrsx.fsf@gnu.org> <4F07779A.10808@mentor.com> <4F0F34EB.3000206@redhat.com> <834nw0kqts.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00480.txt.bz2 On 01/13/2012 02:29 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: > >>> The MI spec does not rule out spaces AFAICT, but I would rather we stick >>> to names similar to those we already use. On this basis, "condeval" is >>> better than "cond.eval.". > > Eli> How about "evaluated-by"? > > Works for me. FAOD, work for me too. -- Pedro Alves