From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26283 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2011 04:06:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 26268 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Nov 2011 04:06:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net (HELO elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net) (209.86.89.68) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:06:17 +0000 Received: from [70.170.59.51] (helo=macbook2.local) by elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1RSL97-0000Bh-50 for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 23:06:17 -0500 Message-ID: <4EC9CE39.40604@earthlink.net> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:06:00 -0000 From: Stan Shebs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: JIT Interface Patches Landed References: <4EC8D2D4.1080402@playingwithpointers.com> In-Reply-To: <4EC8D2D4.1080402@playingwithpointers.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: ae6f8838ff913eba0cc1426638a40ef67e972de0d01da9405bc82eb1fc6a53a464fac305674b2e80350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00539.txt.bz2 On 11/20/11 2:13 AM, Sanjoy Das wrote: > Hi all, > > I've checked in the work I did to implement a (hopefully) simpler JIT > interface. > Did you recheck running with the testsuite? I just saw four regressions in current jit.exp vs a testsuite run I did a week ago, but haven't investigated further. Stan stan@codesourcery.com