From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9628 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2011 19:41:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 9619 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2011 19:41:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net (HELO elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net) (209.86.89.70) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:40:59 +0000 Received: from [70.170.59.51] (helo=macbook2.local) by elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1ROE14-0004lA-Ms for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 14:40:58 -0500 Message-ID: <4EBAD745.8020105@earthlink.net> Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:41:00 -0000 From: Stan Shebs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: preparing the upcoming GDB 7.4 release References: <20111107175402.GI14508@adacore.com> <20111109151240.GM14508@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20111109151240.GM14508@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: ae6f8838ff913eba0cc1426638a40ef67e972de0d01da94047789364f171e2e158b0f544596966c4350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00257.txt.bz2 On 11/9/11 7:12 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> Joel> Any known problem that we should fix? >> >> We have a backlog of unreviewed patches. I would like us to pick a >> deadline and try to review all patches submitted before that date. >> Any date is fine by me, even today. > OK - Let's say all patches submitted Friday or earlier need to be > reviewed prior to branching? > Sounds good. People with neglected patches should re-ping over the next week or so, I actually have some cycles to do reviews but the time gets eaten up wading through old mail, only to find that the patch has been withdrawn for rework. :-) Stan